Headline FeedsMacNewsWorld Talkback
|
|
See Full Story
It's no secret that Apple has dominated the headlines in computing over the last several years, earning new devotees through consumer-aimed offerings like the iPod, iTunes and the iPhone. Whether purposeful or not, gradually or suddenly, Macs have now roared into the business world, with the user-friendly, intuitive capabilities that appeal to home users demonstrating themselves to be very applicable within the enterprise. Macs also afford freedom and flexibility that's not available with a PC -- the ability to use nearly any operating system, be it OS X, Windows or even Linux.
Nice content! Well i would like to discuss one website which has a large database of director jobs
, ceo jobs, cmo jobs, cfo jobs and other c-level jobs. As we know that chief executive officer jobs are quite high profile jobs thats why we should also have good website which can help us to find chief financial officer jobs or chief marketing officer jobs. My choice is http://www.clevelcrossing.com and i hope you people will also enjoy this website.
, ceo jobs, cmo jobs, cfo jobs and other c-level jobs. As we know that chief executive officer jobs are quite high profile jobs thats why we should also have good website which can help us to find chief financial officer jobs or chief marketing officer jobs. My choice is http://www.clevelcrossing.com and i hope you people will also enjoy this website.
eHenry writes as an authority on MACs. I wonder if he's talking about Media Access Control (MAC), or does he mean "Macs"--as in Macintosh computers.
He makes the point that Windows has more software and that Macs would "drownd" [sic] when compared to a PC. I would agree that Windows is powerful, and it has tons of software. It is a compelling platform, especially for businesses. But it's not the only game in town. (I personally find the activation, pop-up notifications, and goofy wizards in XP and Vista to be annoying. Win 7 looks better.)
More and more people have found OS X to have a better user interface, robust UNIX foundation and fewer annoyances. OS X doesn't even require one to type in a product key, much less activate it. (I have a Windows license that I have to activate by phone because I use it in a virtual environment and I had to activate it one too many times.) And there's plenty of high-quality Mac software, much of it free. The idea that Mac users are deprived for software is a myth. After all, the Mac has been around for more than 20 years.
My question is, eHenry, have you used a Mac for an extended amount of time (certainly more than 10 minutes)? Have you looked at the extensive Mac software library to make a judgment of quality? If not, did you stop to think that maybe you don't know much about Macs? Just a thought.
Bot
Mac Fanbot
He makes the point that Windows has more software and that Macs would "drownd" [sic] when compared to a PC. I would agree that Windows is powerful, and it has tons of software. It is a compelling platform, especially for businesses. But it's not the only game in town. (I personally find the activation, pop-up notifications, and goofy wizards in XP and Vista to be annoying. Win 7 looks better.)
More and more people have found OS X to have a better user interface, robust UNIX foundation and fewer annoyances. OS X doesn't even require one to type in a product key, much less activate it. (I have a Windows license that I have to activate by phone because I use it in a virtual environment and I had to activate it one too many times.) And there's plenty of high-quality Mac software, much of it free. The idea that Mac users are deprived for software is a myth. After all, the Mac has been around for more than 20 years.
My question is, eHenry, have you used a Mac for an extended amount of time (certainly more than 10 minutes)? Have you looked at the extensive Mac software library to make a judgment of quality? If not, did you stop to think that maybe you don't know much about Macs? Just a thought.
Bot
Mac Fanbot
Macs also afford freedom and flexibility that's not available with a PC -- the ability to use nearly any operating system, be it OS X, Windows or even Linux. Flexibility and ease of use are driving the adoption of Macs for everyday business uses, resulting in a demand for enterprise-focused capabilities
-------------------------------------
Well lets see, a pc can use linux, unix, windows etc. The only OS it legally cannot use is MAC, yes you can make a nice Hackintosh, but MAC wants to prevent the mac os from going on a pc. So please get your info straight.
What freedom do macs really have?
You have to buy there hardware no customizing. Talk about a monopoly. For all the mac lovers out there, if a mac could do everything windows can..
Be put on any pc of that you want
Had all the different software options that a pc has
Had as many games, programs as windows
I can guarantee a mac would drowned so fast.
I guess mac users are followers not leaders, they like to be told what hardware to use, what apps to use, what monitors to use etc.
The reason mac does not allow there OS on anything but there hardware is it would fail miserable on any type of PC. If a mac had as much flexability as a pc it would be a million times worse that Windows.
The only way a mac will ever be better than windows is when it can do everything windows can do, go on any pc or laptop you want. When it has all the different software programs and games to use. Until than MACS are worthless, overpriced pieces of Junk Made by the Apple Monoply company
-------------------------------------
Well lets see, a pc can use linux, unix, windows etc. The only OS it legally cannot use is MAC, yes you can make a nice Hackintosh, but MAC wants to prevent the mac os from going on a pc. So please get your info straight.
What freedom do macs really have?
You have to buy there hardware no customizing. Talk about a monopoly. For all the mac lovers out there, if a mac could do everything windows can..
Be put on any pc of that you want
Had all the different software options that a pc has
Had as many games, programs as windows
I can guarantee a mac would drowned so fast.
I guess mac users are followers not leaders, they like to be told what hardware to use, what apps to use, what monitors to use etc.
The reason mac does not allow there OS on anything but there hardware is it would fail miserable on any type of PC. If a mac had as much flexability as a pc it would be a million times worse that Windows.
The only way a mac will ever be better than windows is when it can do everything windows can do, go on any pc or laptop you want. When it has all the different software programs and games to use. Until than MACS are worthless, overpriced pieces of Junk Made by the Apple Monoply company
@ eHenry: "You have to buy there hardware." That should be "You have to buy THAT there hardware, SON!" You then stated "The reason mac does not allow there OS on anything but there hardware." That should be "The reason mac does not allow THAT there OS on anything but THAT there hardware..." Personally, I think them there Macs is good, son!
