Welcome | Sign In
LinuxInsider.com
News

SCO's Brilliant Business Maneuver?

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
SCO's Brilliant Business Maneuver?

"Who would trust [SCO] after the IBM suit?" IDC vice president Dan Kusnetzky said. "And they have threatened end-user customers with litigation. In effect, they have destroyed themselves as either a Unix or Linux supplier."


To say the SCO Group has been making headlines frequently is an understatement. Since March, when the company filed suit against IBM (NYSE: IBM) for allegedly using SCO-owned Unix code in its Linux systems, SCO has gotten an unheard-of amount of press for a company that, according to its third-quarter results, posted only US$20.1 million in revenue.

In the last 52 weeks, SCO stock has gone from trading for as little as 78 cents per share to more than $20 per share. Regardless of industry observers' opinion of SCO's grievances, the company's decision to battle IBM and the open-source community certainly has boosted it, at least in the short term.

However, as IDC vice president Dan Kusnetzky told the E-Commerce Times, the legal costs SCO is incurring make its litigation business model (as IBM termed it in a recently filed countersuit) a risky one. Resolution could be years away, and there is no guarantee of an outcome that favors SCO.

Kusnetzky added that a legal victory will not necessarily assure SCO's long-term survival either, unless it is acquired or can reposition itself as a licensing company for intellectual property. In addition to selling IP licenses for Unix, the company provides global Web services and its own proprietary flavor of Unix, called OpenServer -- but it seems far less focused on these products than on winning its $3 billion lawsuit, and this attitude is unlikely to win it many new customers.

What are SCO's long-term plans? Have the company's recent legal maneuverings positioned it for a windfall followed by long-term licensing success Download Free eBook - The Edge of Success: 9 Building Blocks to Double Your Sales, or have they opened a Pandora's box of problems that ultimately will lead to its demise?

The Problem with Litigation

Aberdeen Group research director Bill Claybrook told the E-Commerce Times that if SCO fails to win its lawsuit, the company's stock will drop to $0 because it does not have any products that anyone wants to buy now, let alone four or five years down the road.

According to Claybrook, OpenServer's install base has been eroding, and SCO has not made any significant enhancements to the product that might stanch the customer Increase Customer Sales with Email Marketing -- Free Trial from VerticalResponse outflow. Nor has SCO ever established a Linux presence, which could have mitigated at least some of the hostility that has united the open-source community against the company.

Moreover, Kusnetzky said that to strengthen OpenServer's and UnixWare's market positions, SCO, which does not sell hardware, must maintain good relationships with hardware vendors.

"But who would trust [SCO] after the IBM suit?" he said. "And they have threatened end-user customers with litigation. In effect, they have destroyed themselves as either a Unix or Linux supplier."

Beyond Linux

SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell told the E-Commerce Times that he is well aware of the objections IBM, Red Hat, the open-source community and its allies have to SCO's decision to aggressively pursue the companies it has charged with copyright infringement.

However, Stowell noted that SCO's long-term business strategy does not revolve around the lawsuits. In a recent E-Commerce Times article, he said that SCO's attorneys are working on a contingency basis, which means they will be paid only if SCO wins.

Instead, Stowell said, SCO's long-term plans revolve around future developments to its Unix platform and the expansion of SCOx, the company's .NET equivalent targeted at the small and medium business market, with emphasis on certain verticals.

SCO's TAK(Group)

SCO already has announced a partnership with Portland, Oregon-based TAKGroup, a privately held company that provides e-services and management applications for the downstream petroleum supply chain. TAKGroup's customers, including major petroleum vendors CITGO, ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil, use the company's technology to move their oil and petroleum from ground pumps all the way to individual service stations.

TAKGroup CEO Randy Edgerton told the E-Commerce Times that his company chose to partner with SCO because SCO has a couple of attributes that are critical to success in his industry: great technology and a large global reseller network that can provide services at a local level -- which, in TAKGroup's case, is often the local gas station.

TAKGroup's use of SCOx technology, Stowell said, allows TAKGroup to extend its services beyond its U.S. sites. Also, by taking advantage of SCO's reseller network, TAKGroup can accomplish tasks more efficiently than it can using its own resources alone.

As Edgerton put it, "From our vantage point, [SCO] offers real opportunity for small and medium businesses, and more so those customers who are served by these businesses."

The question now is how many customers will agree when the dust settles.


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Staff Writer


Talkback: Join the Discussion.
Re: SCO's Brilliant Business Maneuver?
cvermejo
Posted 2003-10-17
pump and dump means brilliant business? Unsustained affirmations and tons of postures just for ...
Re: SCO's Brilliant Business Maneuver?
Mediajuggle
Posted 2003-10-17
I hope the SCO does lose their lawsuits and go out of business. There are too many vampire ...

Related News Alerts

IBM Activate Alert | Search Archives

More by Staff Writer

A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round Two: Enderle vs. Chaffin
July 13, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round two of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match, in which Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle square off on one of today's key Mac issues. Today Enderle and Chaffin eachs kicks metaphorical mounds of sand on the arguments the other made in round one on the question of where Apple will be five years from now.
A Midsummer's Mac Death Match, Round One: Enderle vs. Chaffin
July 12, 2004
MacNewsWorld presents round one of our three-round Midsummer Mac Death Match. Today, Mac Observer editor-in-chief Bryan Chaffin and the always-controversial industry analyst Rob Enderle each offer their predictions of what sort of company Apple will be in five years. Will Apple rule the "Digital Life" -- or be the Atari of 2009?
PeopleSoft Blames Oracle for Share Price Free Fall
July 07, 2004
Forrester vice president and CRM analyst Erin Kinikin described PeopleSoft as being on a very narrow tightrope since Oracle first made its takeover offer. "To prove [it] can survive as an independent company, PeopleSoft has to make its numbers," Kinikin told CRM Buyer. "Any time PeopleSoft pre-announces lower earnings, people are going to wonder if [it is] falling off the tightrope."
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network