By Elizabeth Millard E-Commerce Times Part of the ECT News Network
12/09/03 4:03 AM PT
Last summer and into this fall, cable providers increased their advertised downstream maximum speed from 1.5 megabits per second (Mbps) to 2 Mbps or 3 Mbps -- far faster than the speed offered by DSL providers, Forrester analyst Jed Kolko told the E-Commerce Times.
What’s Linux with a Lineage? Verio Linux VPS delivers root access, advanced FairShare technology for better performance, and support that's actually supportive. It's all from Verio, the Virtual Private Server technology pioneer with over 500,000 customers. Test-drive Linux VPS here.
Although dial-up is still the dominant method by which most U.S. residents
access the Internet, DSL and cable are making inroads toward winning the
hearts and dollars of broadband-hungry consumers.
However, not all high-speed Internet providers are created equal. Customers
must choose a provider on the basis of availability, rates, customer service and
reputation, and that decision is not always easy, given the crowded
provider marketplace and conflicting reports on review sites.
Some facts are clear, however, such as who the real contenders are and why
they tower over other competitors. In the Internet access stack-up, which
firms top the list?
Big Guns Only
Although small players do exist in the high-speed Internet access space,
major providers are far from shaking in their boots in fear of scrappy
startups.
Yankee Group analyst Matt Davis told the E-Commerce Times that 80 percent of
broadband market share is held by companies that are already household names.
He cited SBC, Verizon, Qwest and BellSouth as the top DSL providers and
noted that Sprint also is making some progress in the race.
Among cable providers, the list includes Comcast, Time Warner, Cox, Charter and
Cablevision. As Davis noted, "When we talk about market share, it goes to those
carriers who [already] have lines deployed to the customers."
Incumbency Crucial
As anyone who has dealt with large companies likely knows, bigger does not
always mean better. In the case of large providers, however, it may. Even if
a smaller company were to offer superior service, it is doubtful that it could
take on a behemoth like Time Warner or SBC.
As Forrester analyst Jed Kolko told the E-Commerce Times: "It has to do with
being the incumbent. Since people overwhelmingly get broadband from cable,
they go with their cable provider."
Sometimes another provider tries to muscle in, but such efforts tend not to
last for long. "There are a handful of competing providers, but they haven't
done well," Kolko said. "Look at someone like Covad. Companies like these
usually end up doing partnerships just to stay alive."
Mixed Reviews
Because large companies are so established and need to compete with each
other, they often have comparable levels of speed, reliability and customer
service. Davis noted that there is not that much difference between, for
example, Cox and Charter.
On the other hand, consumers may find flaws where analysts do not. On DSL
comparison site DSLreports.com and on Epinions.com, broadband customers
can weigh in with opinions about providers.
A perusal of those sites reveals it can be nearly impossible to pinpoint
which provider is best, simply because reviews are so wildly divergent
from each other.
On DSLreports.com, for example, one customer noted how SBC provided DSL service
even as an ice storm pulverized his city. He wrote that the company's customer
support is so "super-duper" that a rep calls him occasionally to see how he
likes his service. He ended his review with a hearty "SBC ROCKS!!!!!"
In contrast, another customer of SBC stopped calling customer service because,
he said, they wasted his time, insulted his intelligence and got him mad. The
subject line of his review stated: "If you want a slow, unreliable connection
with horrible tech support get SBC."
It's the Money, Honey
Although mixed reviews can make it difficult to determine which provider
is speediest or most user friendly, consumers soon may notice some general
trends in the industry.
Kolko noted that last summer and into this fall, cable providers increased
their advertised downstream maximum speed from 1.5 megabits per second (Mbps)
to 2 Mbps or 3 Mbps. He cited Cablevision as having a 3.5 Mbps downstream and
1 Mbps upstream -- more than double the speed of DSL providers.
However, for most consumers, the decision about which provider to pick
ultimately is not about services, speed or customer support. It is about
cost.
"Price is a big factor," Gartner (NYSE: IT) analyst Lydia Leong told the E-Commerce
Times. "In many places, they aren't even able to get broadband, but in the
places where it's available, usually it's the cost that drives competition."
Kolko agreed, noting that although early broadband adopters wanted speed,
today's broadband adopters are more price-sensitive.
Feature Creatures
Leong noted that to stay ahead in the broadband race, many providers
offer bundles to entice customers.
"You see all kinds of deals," she said. "If you get cable, you can have
broadband for a lowered rate. That's very attractive to consumers."
Sprint is one company that has been aggressive in its quest to be a top provider,
and its service offering is packed with extras. Tom Nelson, who manages Sprint's relationship with EarthLink, told the E-Commerce Times that the company continually tries to be the best by paying attention to customer requests.
"We know customers want a fast and reliable connection," he said. "But they
also want some safeguards like parental controls and the ability to block
spam. Those pieces are just as important as speed."
Amid such a competitive landscape, it is possible that high-speed Internet
providers will remain in a close race for some time to come. That means
that although consumers can and should perform due diligence, they
ultimately may have to switch services to develop a true
understanding of how high-speed providers stack up in
their area.