Explore Technology Certificate Programs That Fit Your Needs /// Click here to learn more.
Welcome Guest | Sign In

New Yorker Launches Strongbox Source-Protection Service

By Erika Morphy TechNewsWorld ECT News Network
May 16, 2013 12:34 PM PT

The New Yorker has launched Strongbox, an anonymous system for providing the publication with information, based on the open source DeadDrop program developed by the late Aaron Swartz and Kevin Poulsen.

New Yorker Launches Strongbox Source-Protection Service

Strongbox can be thought of as an extension of the mailing address printed in small type on the magazine's inside cover, said The New Yorker. Although documents can also be sent to that address, it is becoming more difficult to use the postal service anonymously.

As for online messaging, anonymity has become highly difficult -- a key consideration for Swartz as he set out to build Strongbox, a process that took close to two years, according to Poulsen.

A Simple Service

Swartz worked to keep the service simple, and it was largely ready for launch when he committed suicide in January. He had been under intense pressure by U.S. government prosecutors, and faced possible lengthy imprisonment for allegedly downloading 4 million articles from an academic database.

After determining who owned the code and ascertaining that the service was indeed secure The New Yorker proceeded with the project and set the site live.

New Era

If it works as envisioned, Strongbox could be a significant development for journalism. It even protects publications from knowing who sent a document in the case of a subpoena being issued.

In the recent case of the Justice Department targeting The Associated Press, for example, officials reportedly obtained records of more than 20 phone lines used by journalists. Their purpose apparently was to identify the source -- or sources -- who supplied information for a story about the foiling of a plot to blow up a passenger jet, which the AP published last year.

"Strongbox is much needed, especially given the increase in wrongdoing by government that has recently come to light," Paul Levinson, professor of communication and media studies at Fordham University, told TechNewsWorld.

Certainly it will give The New Yorker a competitive boost in the market for scoops and exclusives, Rich Hanley, associate professor and director of the graduate journalism program at Quinnipiac University, told TechNewsWorld.

"Whistleblowers are more likely to submit documents because they know their identity is protected," he said, increasing confidence that their careers won't be compromised."

The downside, though, is that the site is still mildly complex, despite Swartz's best intentions, Hanley noted.

"That may have a chilling effect on people who are not comfortable with the technology," he said, "and [they] may avoid submitting materials because of it."

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ RSS
Should social media sites be held accountable for terrorists' communications?
Yes -- They are providing a platform to facilitate murder and mayhem.
Yes -- Everything must be done to protect society from danger.
Maybe -- I'm not sure they have the technological capability to stop them.
Maybe -- I'm not convinced terrorists are using them for serious plotting.
No -- Authorities should monitor social networks to gather intelligence.
No -- Social networks are no different than phone carriers or mail services.