Customers and investors increasingly are wondering why Verizon and Verizon Wireless are hurting themselves with their actions.
Following are three examples that illustrate how these companies are causing themselves long-term damage.
The Verizon Strike
Verizon decided to battle its own striking workers on the public stage. That battle shed lots of bad blood, and it will be tough to close those wounds. Many companies experience strikes, but most are settled quickly and quietly. That’s the secret. However, over the last decade or two, every time Verizon workers’ contracts have come up for renewal, the process has been longer, uglier and messier.
Both sides’ positions are understandable. On the employee side, there’s the need to keep up with the rising costs of living. On the company side, there’s the need to remain competitive, as new companies and new technologies change the playing field.
Unfortunately for workers, times change. Just as the horse and buggy industry gave way to the automotive industry, things change. Workers can stress a company so badly that it ends up closing, and everyone loses big time.
Just think of the recent Hostess story. Workers demanded more from the company than the company could afford. Bottom line: Hostess went out of business. All the workers became unemployed. That is the bottom line every union worker needs to understand. Companies are not invincible.
Hostess was acquired by another company, which gave the brand new life. However, the Hostess of today is now free from unions and doesn’t face the same type of worker demands. So, as much as we can all understand worker demands, they must be balanced with reality.
The Verizon strike and the estrangement of its workers planted seeds of distrust and a hard, cold reality into the marketplace — something that will fester and grow. While past strikes quickly faded away, the damage to Verizon’s reputation was more serious this time. If the next strike lasts as long, it will damage the company even further.
The fear is that this festering will have an ongoing impact on investor confidence, business customers, consumers and workers. Verizon has allowed this issue to take a disturbing direction.
Verizon Shows No Respect for Customers
Verizon customers have taken it on the chin in recent years. For example, after a recent hurricane leveled a town, Verizon didn’t reinstall phone service — instead, it forced users to choose wireless.
While this is a trend that indicates the way the industry will move in coming years, it will take many years to get there. Some customers are OK making the switch early. Others don’t want to make the switch at all. Not yet anyway. Nevertheless, they are being forced into a corner to do something uncomfortable to them.
Changes like this must take place at a slower pace. You must turn the screwdriver of change slowly, or risk breaking the screw. In my opinion, Verizon is breaking the screw. It is negatively impacting its relationships with customers by showing no respect or consideration for them.
The Verizon problem, as I see it, is that the company doesn’t seem to care about people –workers or customers. Rather than letting customers change services when they are ready, they are being forced to change now.
Verizon Is Forcing Change
A third example is the way customers say Verizon comes in to fix a phone line problem. They simply replace the POTS telephone service with something else. When they are done and have updated the customer to a digital product, then they surprise the customer telling them what they just did. That is not something many customers want — yet Verizon is forcing the switch.
The choice Verizon gives the customer is either to accept its new service or go without. It doesn’t really care one way or the other. Customers who do not accept simply will have no landline phone.
This very customer-unfriendly approach is chipping away at the core strength of the company — and Verizon is its own chipper. I understand the changes the company wants to make. It wants to go in the direction the industry is heading in.
However, forcing customers to change too fast will hurt Verizon. Turning the screwdriver too quickly will cause problems with customers tomorrow. Now that there is growing competition, other companies will take away more of Verizon’s market share.
It’s not too late for Verizon to change and be the friendly company it was — but to tell you the truth, I don’t think it understands the damage it is causing. In the next few years, as it runs into problems with its customers, those issues will be directly related to the damage Verizon is causing itself today.
I retired a year ago from VERIZON (A veteran of 7 strikes in my 35 years) Now since merge of Bell Atlantic & GTE is has been pure hell. As a damn proud Union Man, I loved my company and was graceful and blessed of its salary/benefits.
Verizon’s wire(less)success is Only because the Union guys on the wire(line)are the backbone of wireless success. The General public generally does not know when you place a call from a cellphone it goes to the cell tower, then goes underground threw Land Lines through a switch/central office (in which the Union members maintain 24 hours a day 7 days a week no break in the schedule), then it goes to the closest cell tower to another person cell phone. IF it wasn’t for us Union Members Maintaining the landlines, cell calls would never go through.
Verizon seems to forget that we are an important party to their success! This company is making 2+Billion dollars profit "every month". Yes Majority is from cellphone. but The cost to the Union benefits is 3 Billion "Per Year", (in the financial statements no need to lie.) what 19 Billion dollars profit aren’t enough? Yes quite a lot of the employees are old school, old bell system employees from back in the great MaBell Days, where all benefits Everything was paid. Yes we also acknowledge times are changing, but, and again but, Wireless Success is Only because of Union maintaining the Landlines for the wireless calls to go through.
So just because a lot of other companies are forcing its people to pay benefits, Verizon is taking the same stance. They don’t need to, they are highly profitable company and will continue to be in the future! Now this new contract is more employee paid medical for active employees, which they are not happy, but with pay increases and other benefits, we are still ahead but by a slim margin.
Now the contract ends in August 2019, but I guarantee by that time again, Verizon will be selling off more of its landlines to other company and focusing only on wireless. As a close monitor of what my company does, I predict that Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts will be sold off. Those states are sparsely rural populated and Verizon is not spending anymore on Fios (except Boston), cause its’ too expensive to maintain rural copper service.
Very sad that Verizon is so anti union, and I mean anti-union, Remember less than 1% of Wireless workforce is Union, and 100% of Landline is Union, what does that tell you? one more thing. People who criticize Union need to remember one thing. If it not for Unions way back in the days, there would be no such word as "benefits". Remember companies were not giving anything that cost them anything. (ok I know all unions are not great we all know that), but again, if you are not a union member and you are getting benefits, thing about who got them for you even if you are anti union, you do owe a lot to a union person because we got you those benefits way back in the days.
As a retiree this contract for my benefits is just about the same as last, so I am grateful for the Bargaining Committee who helped kept our benefits intact. (by the way Verizon wanted to stop the Union from negotiating retiree benefits in this last contract), Verizon will now negotiate with the union Medical benefits for Retirees forgoing into the future (Thank God I am relieved) but only for 3 yrs, then I have to worry about it all over again in 2019.
discolarry125, you’re correct about the backhaul (link between cell sites and switch) in areas that Verizon, or other unionized companies, provide landline service.
I can’t fully agree with you elsewhere. There are many other providers for backhaul service. Those switches aren’t maintained by union members since they are in the Wireless side of the company (in which very few employees are unionized).
As this article mentioned, Verizon may have damaged it’s reputation with some customers. However, the individuals in the unions chose to stop working. They weren’t forced by their employer. Verizon had a business continuity plan, and it worked out better than anyone had hoped.